Though its panel is busy and its faders appear to be close together, there's plenty of room for normal-size fingers to get at all the controls, and the faders don't feel cramped. Despite its size, this little board provides close to the same number of ins and outs as many larger digital mixers. Though aesthetically it may be more pleasing to have all cables out of sight at the rear, the top-panel location is more convenient - and mandatory if the mixer is racked. Cookies help us improve performance, enhance user experience and deliver our services. Just wondering if sonar could do a studioware for the behringer ddx3216 desk, i think someone did but unable to find it i've tried but cant get the. JUDGING BY THE COVER The 24-bit, 44.1 or 48 kHz DDX3216 is a relatively small and narrow mixer (with the included rack ears, the unit is 19 inches wide by 22.5 inches deep), with an angled top panel that rises gently to a horizontal jack field at the back (see Fig. Clearly, Behringer has done a championship job in the features-per-dollar category (actually, make that features-per-euro - the company is German). The features just keep piling up: 24-bit conversion, SMPTE time-code input, MIDI Time Code (MTC) input and output (the unit can generate MTC), word-clock in and out, and even a PC Card slot for storing settings and mixes. It's not that those features are revolutionary - it's that you get them all on a mixer that costs less than $2,000. Okay, how about 16-stage LED meters next to each fader and 17 Channel Control lighted rotary encoders? The DDX3216 is that kind of product. What if I told you that this board lists for $1,999 and has a potential 32 simultaneously available inputs, 4 internal effects processors, full dynamic and snapshot automation, and a total of 17 ALPS 100 mm motorized faders? That's not enough? Then what if I threw in a total of 6 D/A converters, 12 mic/line inputs and 4 line inputs, and parametric EQ and dynamics on every channel? What, you want more? It's hard to describe Behringer's new DDX3216 digital mixer without sounding like an infomercial. In my case, exactly those are spent for the 16-channel connection to the computer, that's why I'm not using it to control Ardour at the moment. So all you can do is spent channels 17-32 for controlling your software. ) The disadvantage of this mixer is that it doesn't have a remote layer like the Yamahas. I'm using mine as a 16 channel AD/DA with a builtin mixer. At least it is not mentioned in the manual.Īre there many people out there interested in using this console to control Ardour? After all they don't manufactor the device any more and I can't judge how widespread it is. I guess the DDX3216 doesn't do Mackie Control Protocol.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |